

74
/ BUILDING DIALOGUE / MARCH 2017
let’s look at water flowing, something like that. It’s got to have
some curves to it, it can’t be square.”
“We knew that the building was going to stand out from
the rest of the neighborhood by its sheer height,” says Gro-
matzky. “What we wanted to do was generate a shape to
the building that began to move and have some motion as
you went around it. It’s a really flowing shape. The building
changes from every angle. It has a fluidity. It will never look
the same from any area whatsoever.”
According to Gromatzky, some of the inspiration for the
design also came from the zoning lines that were established
years earlier.
“I think the actual lines of demarcation that cut across the
site began to dictate the shape of the tower. And then when
we saw the outboard diagrams we simply shaped some soft
curves within those spaces to soften the tower shape and the
tower itself began to resemble the beginning of a soft flower
unfolding.”
Ground was broken in late November 2014 and Ray Suppa
suggested PMRG host a Native American blessing, something
he had done in the past. Given the site’s historic significance,
Nail agreed and Benito Concha, a Taos Pueblo medicine man,
performed a blessing ceremony at the ground breaking.
“This land has always been a crossroads for indigenous
people,” says Concha. “Since our ancestors passed through
this area and camped here, I thought it was important to
perform this ceremony.”
At the ceremony, Concha presented Nail and his teamwith
a cedar bough, a symbol for purity and cleansing to be kept
until the building is finished. That cedar bough still sits in
Nail’s office on-site.
Concha said that when the building is completed and peo-
ple are moving in, Nail and his team are to “place the bough
in the river to return it to nature.”
According to Nail, Concha was back at the topping out in
December and will be in attendance for the grand opening
later this year.
Construction Must Go With The Flow
With design nailed down and the project blessed, PMRG
turned to longtime partner Clark Construction to tackle the
many challenges and bring the vision to life. Some of the
challenges were par for the urban infill course, like staging,
phasing, keeping the neighbors happy and keeping the park
open during construction. Some were more challenging.
“I think the interesting logistical challenge is that we're
sandwiched between the confluence of these two rivers,” says
David Trolian, senior vice president for Clark. “We went down
three to four levels below grade adjacent to the river with a
secant pile foundation system. It was extremely challenging
because there were enormous head pressures of ground wa-
ter on the those walls.”
Another challenge Clark faced was the layout of a high-
rise next to a low-rise. Due to forecasted differential settle-
ment issues, they were forced to leave a pour strip around
the high-rise and leave it separated from the low-rise until