Previous Page  52 / 112 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 52 / 112 Next Page
Page Background

52

/ BUILDING DIALOGUE / MARCH 2015

Low Fee Selection: It’s a Competitive Market

A

lthough most of us seek out the best deal

when shopping for a car, house and tooth-

paste, our team often receives feedback of

frustration from colleagues when clients make

their final selections based on the lowest fee or

lowest bid. The challenge in front of us is to demon-

strate why a client should pay more for our services.

This is very difficult when you are selling a service to

those who have limited industry experience. Is being

selected by low fee always bad? Should we embrace

that we have to provide the lowest fee to win the final

selection? Here are some things to consider on why

owners’ hiring based on lowest fee isn’t all bad.

New markets.

We have seen design and construction

firms have an iron grip on certain project types, be it

libraries, police or recreation centers. We have worked

with great firms with great people who never seem

to have an opportunity to demonstrate their abilities

on these types of projects. In fact, many won’t submit

because their qualifications can’t compare. What if

you had an opportunity to overcome a qualifications

based selection process and break into a whole new

market without teaming or changing your processes?

You might reconsider submitting given the more level

playing field.

New subcontractors.

In the Construction Manager at

Risk process, we see favoritism to certain subcontrac-

tors by certain general contractors. As these subcon-

tractors become complacent and understand how

to bid against the usual two go-to firms, prices creep

up and, as a general contractor, you lose a competitive

edge. Consider blaming the owner and the competitive

process as a way to venture out to a new subcontractor

you may want to work with.

Performance.

Sometimes we have something to prove

when we are given a chance. We have often seen high-

er levels of service from teams that are given a chance.

Typically, a subcontractor or consultant will not take

his new opportunity lightly.

Represent the owner.

Owners want their design team

and general contractors to represent them and their

project goals. We rarely see design teams present how

they procured their consultant team in a way that

demonstrates a consideration for fee. Demonstrate

your effort to get the client the best value and they will

remember it, even if you are not the lowest fee.

Recession ready.

Working with the same consul-

tants and subcontractors time and time again is not

a true depiction of the market and may not prepare

you when the next recession comes. There are many

smaller, younger, more nimble firms that youmight be

missing out on. Be ready to win work when price is a

significant driver.

Bid ready.

When interviewing general contractors, we

Paul D.

Wember

President,

Wember

TRENDS

in Owner’s Representation

ROCKY MOUNTAIN GROUP

A

Design Team

for Every

Phase of Development

•Architectural Design • Structural Engineering

• Land Planning • Civil Engineering

• Goetechnical Engineering • Materials Testing

• Forensic Engineering

Serving Colorado For Over 28 Years

Southern Colorado

Colorado Springs

719.548.0600

Denver Metro

Englewood

303.688.9475

Northern Colorado

Greeley

970.330.1071